Menu Click here
website logo
Sign In| Sign Up
back back
Diamond trading
Search for Diamonds Manage Listings IDEX Onsite
diamond prices
Real Time Prices Diamond Index Price Report
news & research
Newsroom IDEX Research Memo Search News & Archives RSS Feeds
back back
Diamond trading
Search for Diamonds Manage Listings IDEX Onsite
diamond prices
Real Time Prices Diamond Index Price Report
news & research
Newsroom IDEX Research Memo Search News & Archives RSS Feeds
back back
MY IDEX
My Bids & Asks My Purchases My Sales Manage Listings IDEX Onsite Company Information Branches Information Personal Information
Logout
Newsroom Full Article

Class Action Suit against De Beers Certified

July 28, 05 by Edahn Golan

A Madison, Illinois County Circuit Judge has certified a class action case against De Beers because it failed to appear or respond to a complaint by a local couple.

 

Judge George Moran, Jr. certified the class action last Friday, July 22, against DB Investments, De Beers S.A., DBCM, De Beers Centenary A.G. and the DTC.

 

The suit was filed against De Beers on February 17, the day before President George W. Bush signed into law the Class Action Fairness Act that makes class actions a little more difficult, on behalf of Emert and Katie Null of Madison County.

 

The Nulls claim that De Beers is a century old cartel, dominating the international rough diamond, controlling as much as 80 percent of the world diamond supply. Currently, the suit alleges, De Beers controls 50 percent of the world’s diamond supply, and an even greater percentage of the supply of two-carat and larger rough diamonds.

 

In 2003 De Beers used its market position to raise the price of rough diamonds three times during the year, allegedly creating a 10 percent hike in rough diamond prices, the Nulls claim.

 

Certifying is a procedure in bringing class suits, and comes during or after the summons and complaint is filed.  In some jurisdictions class certification may require additional discovery in order to determine if the proposed class has any cohesiveness.

 

At this time the defendants may attack the named plaintiffs, their relationship with the law firm or firms handling the case, and their ability to finance the litigation. The court might also examine the ability of the firm to prosecute the claim for the plaintiffs, and their resources for dealing with class actions.

 

In this case, the class action is brought on behalf of diamond purchasers to recover damages for violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practice Act and for unjust enrichment.

 

The complaint states the action is not based on federal law and the Nulls do not seek and will not accept recovery in excess of $75,000 exclusive of costs and interest.

 

“Having reviewed the factual allegations of the complaint and plaintiff's motion for class certification the court hereby grants the motion for class certification,” Moran wrote, appointing the Nulls as class representative.

Diamond Index
Related Articles

A U.S. Diamond Bourse President Sues De Beers

September 06, 04 by Albert Robinson

Read More...

Katie versus Nicky in Madison County: Reflections on a Weird Class Action

May 12, 05 by Chaim Even Zohar

Read More...

Newsletter

The Newsletter offers a quick summary of the past week's industry news and full articles.
Our Services About IDEX Privacy & Security Terms & Conditions Sign-Up Advertise on IDEX Industry Links Contact Us
IDEX on Facebook IDEX on LinkedIn IDEX on Twitter